[ Be Logo ] [ Home ][ Site Map ][ Search ][ Contact ][ Be Europe ][ Aboutbe Banner ]
About Be, Inc.Be ProductsThe World of BeDeveloper ServicesJobs @ Be[Bottom]

Strategy

Executive Profiles

Board of Directors

Company Background

Be Investor Relations

Be Branding

Contact Be

Jean-Louis Gassée Column

|
  Jean-Louis Gassée Column

 

Intellectual Property and Internet Appliances
May 24, 2000

Historically, there have been two views on possession of property: "What's mine is mine and what's yours is negotiable"; or "What's mine is mine and what's yours is yours." When I write historically, I refer to nobles and peasants; Bolsheviks and kulaks; as well as to the Founding Fathers, libertarians, and followers of Ayn Rand -- to name but a few prominent actors and ideological types on the historical stage. I'll let the reader decide who fits where.

The antagonists in realm of music, however, are clear. There is a peasant revolt against big companies' over lordship of music publishing and distribution. Or so it seems. Some observers call the Napster phenomenon a normal but transient manifestation of extreme aural gratification, encouraged by pervasive Net connections, MP3 compression, and cheap computing power. Others call it a profound new beginning. More somber haruspices see strife and poverty in the entrails of yesterday's cozy CD business. Actually, it's all this and more.

The FTC's felicitous timing in accusing the Big Guys of CD music publishing of pricing collusion makes the peasant revolt sentiment credible, if not exactly justified. Any argument that there is no constitutional right to free music falls on deaf ears -- pardon my choice of words. There's an emotional reaction: it's proper revenge for corporate abuse of power; I'm burning the castle -- and a lot of CDs.

As for the freeloaders' gluttony, the argument goes that digital music abusers wouldn't have purchased all this music anyway, so the damage to publishers and artists isn't what it's claimed to be. I'm not so sure that this is true. It used to be that I heard a tune on the radio, went to the store, and bought the record. Now, I can launch Napster and grab the tune on the Net. With fashion driving the process, success can be ephemeral and the damage lasting. This is critical success with a new Winamp skin: great reviews, no money.

It doesn't have to end up this way, though. My hope is that digital music appliances will help straighten out the problem in two ways. One is by making secure and very inexpensive music sales possible; the other is by signaling the beginning of a land redistribution.

If and when the powers that be agree on a good secure music food chain, entertainment appliances will receive and play encrypted music. If this is coupled with the ability to make micro-payments, then artists, their publishers, promoters, and other saprophytes will be able to make their money. At the same time, I'll get inexpensive music on demand on my connected entertainment system, its synchronized MP3-man, or a fourth generation multimedia cell phone or PDA.

This won't prevent pirates from pirating, but the convenience of grabbing content will be matched by equally painless revenue generation. One correspondent wrote that total security was impossible and included a URL for a column making that point. It turned out to have been written by the CEO of a security company. *Beware of these column-writing CEOs.* Yes, piracy is eternal, and it can be made less attractive, more difficult, less rewarding and, possibly, more painful. Cell phones are pirated, but the cell phone industry isn't doing too badly.

I called my second hope for the future of music sales "land redistribution." Market access used to be controlled by a few large and larger publishers. This made it practically impossible for a majority of artists to be heard, seen, or published in other media. The capillary market created or revealed by Napster points to a nice opportunity for artists and smaller publishers to reach a very large number of listeners who are willing to pay a very small fee, without sinking an infinite amount of money into marketing. If the Napster way wins, we'll all be richer for the more diverse cultural scene it enables, freed from today's choke points.

Lastly, encryption can help make music both free and paid for. For instance, one download can be played on my connected stereo in two ways: with advertising, like my favorite country music station; or, for a small payment, without the ads.

  Past Columns:

March 7, 2001
Intemperance Makes the Suit Look Bad

February 7, 2001
The Web Device of Choice at Home

January 17, 2001
Transfer of Power

December 6, 2000
One Step Closer

November 15, 2000
Thoughts on Comdex 2000

November 1, 2000
Watching the Pendulum

October 4, 2000
Plus çà change...

September 6, 2000
Connected Appliances: A Field Report

August 16, 2000
Sub-PC vs. Appliances

July 12, 2000
The Victim Microsoft

June 7, 2000
The Power of Words

May 31, 2000
The First Be Shareholders Meeting

May 24, 2000
Intellectual Property and Internet Appliances

May 17, 2000
Spreading the Virus

May 10, 2000
Numbers and Feedback

May 3, 2000
Manufacturing Consent



.
About Be, Inc. | Be Products | World of Be | BeOS Support | Jobs | Developers | Press | Partners | Investors
.
Copyright © 2001 by Be, Inc. All rights reserved. (Legal Info)
Comments, questions, or confessions about our site? Please write the Webmaster!