[ Be Logo ] [ Home ][ Site Map ][ Search ][ Contact ][ Be Europe ][ Aboutbe Banner ]
About Be, Inc.Be ProductsThe World of BeDeveloper ServicesJobs @ Be[Bottom]

Strategy

Executive Profiles

Board of Directors

Company Background

Be Investor Relations

Be Branding

Contact Be

Jean-Louis Gassée Column

|
  Jean-Louis Gassée Column

 

The Music Industry and PCs
March 21, 2001

Around four years ago, the music industry started something called the Secure Digital Music Initiative. Apparently, it fizzled, because there is no evidence of it today. Yes, we have proposals and possible formats such as Sony's ATRAC, but in practice, MP3 is king. Real Networks and Microsoft are fighting it out in the marketplace with ambitious plans to provide complete encoding and playback solutions, while Napster tries to transition from perceived accomplice of piracy to partner of the "legit" music industry. But we still have no practical, standardized way to buy secure digital music.

In theory, secure digital music lets buyers and sellers do business on attractive terms. The basic business model is similar to the time-tested telephone financial structure. The phone companies have a costly infrastructure but, once that is in place it doesn't cost the Baby Bell a red cent when I pick up the phone and dial, and they generate nice profit margins by charging me a few units of currency. Put another way, the phone companies have near-zero incremental costs.

Returning to selling secure digital music online, we see the similarity. A relatively expensive infrastructure is needed, after that, selling me one hour of Mikhail Pletnev costs the company very little. On the buy side, I can choose between "transient" and "persistent" versions. The first one plays and disappears. The second is stored on my computer, playable at will, as with a CD, but impossible to duplicate or pirate -- hence, secure.

So why hasn't security arrived?

We can dispose of the loudspeaker wires explanation: you can record the music in "clear text" out of the speaker connector, thus defeating the whole purpose. That was always true and the Napster saga demonstrates that we prefer the easy digital reproduction process -- less work and better quality. The same is true for pirating CDs, which took off with the availability of CD-R and CD-RW drives.

The real explanation is that PCs are easily hacked and the hack can spread almost instantly to millions through the same network used to trade pirated content. Let's assume for a moment that we have software on a PC that provides a secure environment for streaming, saving, and playing back digital music. A determined individual or team will always find a way to defeat the protection. We've seen, or rather heard, the fracas over unlocking DVD codes for playback on Linux systems. Once the defeating code is available, it spreads like a virus, with the important difference that many people welcome it.

The problem doesn't lie with human nature and its instinct for picking locks and "liberating" property. No, the real trouble lies with the PC. It's too easily accessible, too easily modified to all kinds of ends, and too exciting a medium for experimentation to prove one's intellectual personhood.

By now you've figured out where I'm going. The key to unlock, rather than secure, digital music and its market potential is the appliance. Few people hack the software in cars (actually, I'm looking for one such magician, but that's another story). Few take pains to pry open game consoles, replay TV recorders, or DirecTV boxes. Which is not to say that pirates will be discouraged by appliances, but the hacks won't spread the way they can and do on PCs.

Herein lies one of the reasons for our Home Audio Reference Platform, HARP. That is, we believe appliances solve the secure digital music problem in ways PCs can never match.

  Past Columns:

March 7, 2001
Intemperance Makes the Suit Look Bad

February 7, 2001
The Web Device of Choice at Home

January 17, 2001
Transfer of Power

December 6, 2000
One Step Closer

November 15, 2000
Thoughts on Comdex 2000

November 1, 2000
Watching the Pendulum

October 4, 2000
Plus çà change...

September 6, 2000
Connected Appliances: A Field Report

August 16, 2000
Sub-PC vs. Appliances

July 12, 2000
The Victim Microsoft

June 7, 2000
The Power of Words

May 31, 2000
The First Be Shareholders Meeting

May 24, 2000
Intellectual Property and Internet Appliances

May 17, 2000
Spreading the Virus

May 10, 2000
Numbers and Feedback

May 3, 2000
Manufacturing Consent



.
About Be, Inc. | Be Products | World of Be | BeOS Support | Jobs | Developers | Press | Partners | Investors
.
Copyright © 2001 by Be, Inc. All rights reserved. (Legal Info)
Comments, questions, or confessions about our site? Please write the Webmaster!